12.08.08
Southern Voice: Arkansas adoption ban could start national trend
Posted in Anastasius I, California Constitution, California Superior Court, Equality Center, John McCain, Justinian, Kathoey, LGBT Families, Newt Gingrich, Theodosius I, XM, ancient greece, ancient rome, antinous, claudius, coming out, coming out project, effeminacy, empowerment, florence, hadrian, ladyboys, male body, opposite-sex marriage, policy analysis, transvestism, venice, wrath of god tagged adoption ban, anti-gay, Arkansas, Arkansas adoption ban, Arkansas family council, atlanta, bigots, California, churches, co-parents, cohabitation, conservatism, constitutional rights, Denise Matyka, Discrimination, equality, Florida, foster care, foster children, gay adoption, gay churches, Gay Community, gay couples, gay fostering, gay marriage, gay politicians, gay rights, gay sex, georgia, Hillary Clinton, homosexual agenda, Jerry Cox, Kansas City, lesbianism, lgbt community, little rock, Madison, Margaret McMurray, missouri, Opinions, partner benefits, Proposition 8, same-sex parents, sexual orientation, social conservatism, social networking, unconstitutional, unmarried couples, Wisconsin at 4:54 am by aerosynth
FROM THE SOUTHERN VOICE:
Georgia seen as potential target for similar legislation
By MATT SCHAFER
DEC. 5, 2008Jerry Cox doesn’t need flashy campaigns or a lot of money to “blunt the homosexual agenda” in Arkansas. He’s done it twice, and all he needs is a ballot box and a church bulletin insert.
Cox is president of the Arkansas Family Council, a relatively small religious organization that is dedicated to, among other things, thwarting civil rights for gay people. The Arkansas Family Council won an unexpected success for social conservatives on Nov. 4 when 57 percent of the state’s voters approved the “Arkansas Adoption and Foster Care Act,” a measure that banned unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children. The measure applies regardless of sexual orientation, but was designed to target gay couples.
Polls leading up to the event showed a much closer race, and the work behind the upset win might empower conservative groups in Georgia, Cox said.
Cox and the Arkansas Family Council essentially circumvented the state legislature in Little Rock and appealed directly to the state’s rural, religious base. He believes that same strategy could work in Georgia.
“It’s probably the case that when you get out of Atlanta you find that the rest of the state isn’t that liberal, and that’s the same in Arkansas,” Cox said.
The Arkansas Family Council was outspent by its opposition. They were unable to mount much of a media campaign in response to television ads and endorsements by gay-friendly politicians, so Cox had to find another way to reach his voters.
Where gays have found success turning to social networking sites, the Arkansas Family Council turned to an older form of social networking — the church door. The Arkansas Family Council distributed bulletin inserts to more than 1,000 churches.
“That as much as anything turned it around,” Cox said.




